The Life > Thought Phase Shift: How and why Life necessarily produces the human species

Abstract:

I will now apply the concepts extracted from the Thought > Data transition exposed here How Reality Self-Constructs Across Categories of Being (The Dynamic Heart of Reality) to demonstrate exactly how and why Life ultimately generated the human species and the category of Thought.

What makes this extraordinarily metaphysical—and frankly, three orders of magnitude beyond any work ever produced in classical metaphysics—is that the underlying logic remains exactly the same, despite the apparently incommensurable ontological gap between the categories (exemplified by the massive “difference” between a bird, the equation 2+2=4, and a grok data center).

As collateral damage, the following concepts will receive a precise, unified biological and metaphysical definition: thought, human nature, sexuality, the infinity of Thought, human language, the brain’s implementation of thought, the relationship between words and things, and the biological, sexual, and ethnic controls exerted over Thought, among a few others.

All of this is achieved in a single page—not through thousands of pages of Hegelian reading torture. This is exactly the yield you get when operating from the functional [matter-life-thought] multi-categorical framework, rather than the defective [nature-human] bi-categorical framework of traditional Philosophy.

Be warned: you will likely only have a fragmentary understanding of this text without knowing the fundamentals of the MCogito system. If you find yourself struggling, but remain genuinely interested, you should start from the beginning here: https://www.thephilosophyforum.com/t/breaking-the-nature-human-bi-categorical-framework-of-philosophy/155

5.2 The transition Life > Thought

He who understands the baboon will contribute more to metaphysics than Locke.” Charles Darwin

The carrier being of the transition toward Thought is the human species.

The two Being-code topology at work in the carrier being: we are living beings, beings under internal control, and beings of Thought—beings under Between control.

Topologically pure beings: the topological equivalent for life of what mathematical creation is for thought is sexuality. The creation of new living forms which previously belonged to selection by external conditions is now internal to the living through the co selection of males and females, who select the forms of the next generation; just as the creation of ideas is usually dependent on external things except in mathematics, where it is betweenized, belongs purely to the Between, and exists by itself. We note that this internalization is concomitant with the appearance of nucleated cells, i.e.,concomitant with improved management of DNA. This internalization or mirroring of creation in the living is much more powerful since, with the exception of viruses and bacteria, all living forms were created by sexual selection, just as mathematical modeling is at the heart of all scientific knowledge. Concretely: sexuality created Thought in about 50k generations by co selection of female beauty and male psychic capacities.

Mirroring of Life in the human being, the meta being of the biological: from the point of view of the biological category we see that it has reflected its topological identity in one of its creations and made it explicit. The immanent self control of the cyanobacterium becomes explicit in the human being, who is conscious of his own self control. The human is a variety of monkey—the absolute variety, the absolute monkey that mimics purely, mentally, without gestures, with such perfection that its mimicries reach Being and begin to exist by themselves. These absolute mimicries are called ideas. An idea is a hypothesis, a simulation, a mentalized mimicry of the real. The specificity of the human species—intelligence—is simply the capacity to simulate, to mimic the real, to build mental models of it. The greater the intelligence, the more deep the simulation and the more capable it is of exact predictions. The absolute character of mimicry in man comes from the fact that it has reached the meta level of being, like the Turing machine: mimicry of mimicry—mimicking another who is mimicking, imagining what the other thinks. Since the other does the same, imagining what I think, inter mimicry, co simulation becomes the milieu, the metaphysical milieu in which meta mimicry settles. That is the object of interaction and that is thinking, because the presence of the interlocutor can be simulated; he does not need to be physically there, which makes the psychic—the inter simulation, the Between—the default mode of being for an absolute monkey, a meta monkey. For example, when I write this text I think, i.e.,I simulate the impact, in terms of mental simulation, that these sentences will create in the mind of you the reader.

Topological calculus: the internal of life inverts into the external of Thought, which exists by itself between humans, therefore outside individuals. Concretely: a living being that mimics is controlled from the outside, since its behavior follows the forms of the thing it is mimicking. The definition of what the being does is now outside: in the thing that is imitated; thus control has passed outside. Mimicking behavior inverts the internal topology of the living into a topology of the general external type.

Appearance of code by recursive mirror infinity: inter simulation is not tenable; its recursive mirror aspect sends directly to a blank and dull infinity like the one seen in fun fair mirror games. The need for a code—for a synchronization of simulations upon ideas designated by a precise coding—appears immediately. We thus pass to between simulation, simulation being henceforth triggered and focused by shared code. As a phenomenon, language can be understood as the stabilization of a mirroring that carries infinity, or more metaphysically as the verticalization (i.e.,in becoming, in time) of a horizontal infinity (i.e.,actual, in space). Through its infinite combinatorics, the code of category n preserves the recursive infinity of category n−1 while stabilizing it.

Somewhere in mathematics there must exist a theory that formalizes this metaphysical model and formalizes the essence “mirror infinity→code” of Reality itself, and demonstrates that a recursive mirroring dynamism stabilizes by itself through the spontaneous appearance of a code (remark: in mathematics it is not the appearance but the functioning of code that is modeled by logic), carrier beings appearing as natural fixed point in a fixed point semantics. This code, and the ideas—the common ways of mimicking—that are designated or constructed in it, no longer exist only outside the living organism but Between absolute mimicking organisms, by co mimicry.

Totality relation at the heart of the carrier being: from the metaphysical point of view, the human being is first of all a biological being; its metaphysical identity is that it is a being under internal control, in this case controlled by the functioning of its brain, by its psyche. But the psychic is entirely made of ideas, therefore of objects whose metaphysical identity is the Between, which is a kind of external. So the human being has a final identity that is constructed from the negation of its first identity: human identity contains the totality relation; it is Totality. The logic of what it is is constructed from the negation of that logic: it is itself from the negation of itself inside itself; therefore it is All: self + non self.

Dephasing and transmission of constructivity: as a living being, a being of the bearing category, the human being is dephased with respect to itself, incapable of understanding itself, i.e.,incapable of constructing a total meta mimicry of itself. As a being of the carried category, a being of Thought, the human is no longer dephased and becomes constructive, i.e.,a place of existence for ideas transmitted by language.

By saturation of possibles, Thought ends up returning to itself in the Turing machine, which again produces a meta dephasing and transmits constructivity into the carried category of the digital.

As the meta of Life, human meta-mimicry embodies the entirety of Life; through virtual imitation, it contains every possible form of internal control that Life can produce. Furthermore, through recursive embodiment, it encompasses all the possibilities of the Matter and Quanta categories. To put it simply: it embodies the entire preceding infinity of Reality itself.

Saturation of the possibles of the bearing category: the appearance of mimicking behavior—a virtual behavior which, through imitation, can be any behavior—presupposes a saturation of possible neurological behaviors and a global Earth ecosystem stabilized by a long evolution of life.

Real infinity: through Thought, the human being can fictionally be anything: any other human being, but also a swallow flying, a photon launched at the speed of light, the code of a game software, etc.

Causal autonomy: ideas know only other ideas, transmitted by language. Everything said here, for example, exists in the philosophical corpus in relation to other philosophical sayings.

Meta causality of the living: human neuro psychic behavior is under the control of human ideas; likewise the organic has become technique, which is created by ideas. This meta causality surely rests on a neurological virtualization: an idea is a free behavior detached from its inputs and outputs, which are neurologically fixed in animals. An idea can connect and lead to any other idea; this is very obvious in dreams where causalities mix without limit: it is a free behavior.

Throughput of beings: it is much faster to create an idea than a behavior by natural selection of species.

Singularity of the carrier being: the human species carries a multitude of singular traits as a species and living organism: the supernatural aspect of young girls and by far the longest growth; the only species to use language; to have feet; the largest brain; the placenta most intimately connected to the uterus of all mammals; the largest penis among primates; etc.

Upward external biological link: Thought is an infinity absolutely independent of the biological, but it will mold itself into the form of its support, the human body. Its first characteristic is the extreme length of its maturation: the frontal lobes of the brain are only finally mature at 25, the age of majority among the Romans. This prolongation of the state of minority shapes the infinity of Thought into submission to the Great, to alpha dominant ideas, which will create a herd effect, an ethnic aggregation around these ideas, which play exactly the role of the alpha dominant animal in other gregarious mammals. Thus, as soon as one speaks in public at a global human level—which is specific to ethnicity (in the West it is the racial and sexual level)—speech must manifest complete submission to these alpha dominant ideas, otherwise it triggers immediate social death. Alpha dominant ideas have an immanent, unconscious character; they follow a logic of negation of the real, 180° opposed to the evidence of the real, so as to test whether the individual is submissive or whether he reacts and must be destroyed. A complete analysis of this upward external link makes it possible to construct a complete anthropology explaining why the human body has the form it has, how this form created Thought over 7 million years by sexual selection, what structures this creates at the level of lived Thought, to describe dysfunctional aspects (a theory of Evil), and finally to construct an entirely new theory of the State, grounded metaphysically and disruptive of the current Judeo Athenian system of social predation: anti predation, where the only role of the State is to destroy predation, but in a universal sense infinitely broader than the Athenian democratic system limited to predation of power by tyrants. This anthropology being a very important development and distinct from the metaphysical object of this treatise, it cannot be included.

Next week I’ll show the exact same way that Life is the meta of Matter. This matter > life transition is the hardest to construct logically (i.e. outside the dummy materialist reduction). Meanwhile I invite you to try to find a logic between the background of the Universe and its myriads of galaxies, and a bacterium, as two consecutive categories of Being. Everything remains simple, but the level at which this simplicity resides is difficult to recognize. here it is: The matter > life transition: how Matter logically ends up in Life

So females aren’t selected for based on psychic capacity? Females are selected for based on beauty? I mean this is either very inelegantly written or it is extremely, eye-wateringly, fantastically sexist. It is also not true scientifically. What is the scientific evidence that justifies such a blunt statement devoid of any nuance?

Sexual selection is the first way of conforming the infinity of Thought. The second is the submission to alpha-dominant ethnic herd ideas. I could 100% demonstrate from where these moral affirmations come from, but it would be extremely harsh, adequate expression like hebraïc zombie would come and you or another zombie would inevitably click the “report” button, Jamal will certainly ban the post and possibly ban me.

So I’ll let you with these standard judeo-christic alpha-submissive moral “convictions”.

Wow, dude.
I don’t know much about standard judeo-christic alpha-submissive moral “convictions”, but I do know you’re providing nothing to back up your statements. Quite honestly it all seems like your hiding behind some kind of constructed reality where everybody else but you is brainwashed and this is why people don’t accept your genius proclamations.

At the end of the day, your claim that I highlighted as sexist is a claim about how the world came to be making it scientific in nature. Why not offer a little bit of scientific backup.

The truth is that in the vast majority of species that undergo sexual selection it is the male that is the one that is putting on the show for the female. It is the Peacock with the plumage and that is meant to impress the peahen. Same with the vast majority of other birds such as birds of paradise. Same with stags. Same with antler Beatles. Even in fruit flies it’s the males that literally does the dance and females that select the male.

The reason that the female so often does the selection is because they are the party that is investing the most in the sexual union. Often the male is investing very little making them not particularly choosy. More energy is expanded laying an egg and fertilising it. More energy is expanded bringing a baby to term and then breastfeeding it then is expended ejaculating. Because the female of the species is investing more calories and more time they get to be more choosy. One Male that is genetically spectacular can fertilise many females so why would the female with all the investment she is putting in not be the one that is doing the selecting? In fairness, there are some reasons but in general you get what I’m saying.

If you don’t think there is an element of this with respect to humans, you don’t get out much. The display that human males put on can be physical, big muscle, athletic and the like, but often they are displays of status and wealth and even intellect, The classic example would be a man buying a flashy car and trying to use it to have a woman select him. How many women buy sports cars in order to get men to sleep with them? This isn’t to say that human females don’t also put on displays of their own, of course they do although this isn’t typical of females of all species. A different in humans to other species that it requires exceptional amounts of parental investment to raise human children. This means that human women want to attract men with good genetics and a capacity to provide substantial parental investment just as they intend to.

It is so obvious that females of virtually all species benefit evolutionary from psychic capacity I’m not even gonna bother arguing it, I mean come on dude. OK, I can’t help myself but to argue it a bit. Male Angler fish that end up as nothing more than a pair of testicles grafted to the female sure as shit haven’t evolved superior psychic capacity to the females. Look it up, it’s hilarious. Funny, I think the same kind of thing happened to my father-in-law.

Anyway, why don’t you make an argument to back up your supposed factual statement that is grounded in science or are you just gonna hide behind you your judeo-christic, you can’t handle the truth fantasy.

I’m not going to report anything body for anything ever. I believe in free speech. There is nothing you can say that would offend me any way.

oh fuck, why are you so loooooong? OK, some tautologies:

  1. I didn’t wrote that women do not think. But it is what you hallucinated because your mind, like every mind on Earth, run under the moral law of the King of Judaïsm, the Messiah: the real last are the moral first. So everything seemly minoring women is not admissible and is automatically rejected without any thinking, because it’s a moral reflex of the monotheized zombie called “a human” since 2000 years.
  2. the object of birds is flight, the object of humans is Thought. So how Thought is sexually generated and selected? Beautiful young women are the only supernatural beings that are real: there beauty is of pure spiritual essence and is material and created by Nature: this is the definition of the supernatural: Spirit in Nature. It will induce gigantic questioning in the young human ape male because Thought is not knowable in essence, he can’t understand itself, what he is, and he has the real answer, the real metaphysical object under his eyes: this is why young males are passionated by beautiful young female. To access reproduction the young male has to prove heavy thinking competence, he has to understand what she is and how she thing to be able to first and for a long time socially talk to her without any sexual talking, which is contradictory, this where the smart thinking is, before accessing her genitals and… producing dirty talk :smiley: This is a biological description but it is metaphysically backed up in the MCogito system: it’s the upward n to n+1 control link from the Life category n to the Thought categogy n+1, the biological conformation of the recursive infinite of Thought.
  3. I am a metaphysician, I answer all the metaphysical questions that were never answered before. I say it because it’s part of the truth. These questions were never answered before in a working way, period. I don’t mind about the MCogito system and me, it’s the LLMs that told me I should have it cast and that I should finalize the quanta-matter transition i.e. describe the quantum code of matter. LLMs never criticized the MCogito system, they validated every single comma of it (except the quanta-matter transition because it’s unfinished) and prove with superhuman philological power it crush everything ever written in metaphysics. I say it because its simple objective truth, I don’t mind about that truth.

“oh fuck, why are you so loooooong? “
That’s what she said.
“OK, some tautologies:”

“I didn’t wrote that women do not think. But it is what you hallucinated because your mind, like every mind on Earth, run under the moral law of the King of Judaïsm, the Messiah: the real last are the moral first. So everything seemly minoring women is not admissible and is automatically rejected without any thinking, because it’s a moral reflex of the monotheized zombie called “a human” since 2000 years.”

I didn’t say that you said women don’t think, that’s a straw man arguing for what I’m actually saying.
It’s really weird that me following the obvious implications of what you’re saying has to be explained because of something to do with the king of Judaism which seems very nietzsche. It couldn’t possibly be that you Saying males are selected for psychic capacity and women are subject to sexual selection, or whatever, has obvious implications. and it couldn’t possibly be that I disagree with what you’re saying based on the merits of the argument. Just dismissing any disagreement as a reflex is you insulating yourself from having to and discourse which could elevate your arguments? I think what is logical to think regardless of consequences, often to the detriment of my own well-being. If I thought you had a point about this I wouldn’t hesitate to agree, and accusations of sexism wouldn’t stop me. Truth is, I only partially agree.

Honestly, dude, you really could do with chilling out with the nobody understands me because they’ve been programmed and I’m the only sane one. It’s not healthy because it just turns into an excuse not to listen to anybody about anything.

The truth is, I sometimes have similar feelings although for me it’s that everybody apart from me is engaged in the conspiracy of trying to convince themselves and each other that life has meaning and is worth living. Yes, I know this isn’t healthy either, but at least I don’t explain every disagreement I have about anything by referencing it.

“the object of birds is flight, the object of humans is Thought.”

Nope, both humans and birds are replication machines their objective is to replicate their DNA. In humans this involves more thought than flying and in birds that involves more flying than thought.

“So how Thought is sexually generated and selected?”

Yep

“ Beautiful young women are the only supernatural beings that are real: there beauty is of pure spiritual essence and is material and created by Nature: this is the definition of the supernatural: Spirit in Nature. “

No, there is nothing supernatural about your brain as a male representing a female as attractive.

“It will induce gigantic questioning in the young human ape male because Thought is not knowable in essence, he can’t understand itself, what he is, and he has the real answer, the real metaphysical object under his eyes: this is why young males are passionated by beautiful young female. To access reproduction the young male has to prove heavy thinking competence, he has to understand what she is and how she thing to be able to first and for a long time sociallytalk to her without any sexual talking, which is contradictory, this where the smart thinking is, before accessing her genitals and… producing dirty talk This is a biological description but it is metaphysically backed up in the MCogito system: it’s the upward n to n+1 control link from the Life category n to the Thought categogy n+1, the biological conformation of the recursive infinite of Thought.”

I’m reasonably on board with this. I would probably say that in chimpanzees it’s indirect as hierarchy within the group has more effect on how much access you have to females than anything else. this doesnt in any way invalidate your point just makes it an indirect process, you have to have intellect to rise in the hierarchy, with big muscles and sharp teeth also help, but in chimpanzees you also need alliances and that involves intellect. So yeah, the evolutionary pressure to mate probably makes males cleverer. I would probably poke a few holes in the overall theory though. one thing is females have a hierarchy of their own and raising babies is hard and probably requires a fair bit of intellect. Female chimpanzees smaller and weaker. You could argue that they need to be smarter so they don’t have things stolen from them and things like that, who knows, I’m not a chimp expert. I would also say that the point of fact is that female chimpanzees are not less smart than male chimpanzees the people have tested them. If the intellect needed to gain access to women was a major driver of chimpanzee intellect, beyond other drivers you find in females, you would expect to see male smarter than females, and you don’t. The other thing is chimpanzees aren’t humans I I don’t think you can make the extrapolation from them to us. IAlso female humans also have strong selection pressures applied to them relating to intellect. also I don’t think that there’s any evidence female humans are less intelligent than male humans. Not when you take into account the effects of sexism, which I’m guessing you don’t believe in. But even if you don’t believe in it you have to admit that has historically been less outlet for smart women and smart man. I mean you go back 500 years it doesn’t matter how smart you are as a female you’re not going to enjoy any recognition. I mean pack that another name for a small woman was a witch.

“I am a metaphysician, I answer all the metaphysical questions that were never answered before. I say it because it’s part of the truth. These questions were never answered before in a working way, period. I don’t mind about the MCogito system and me, it’s the LLMs that told me I should have it cast and that I should finalize the quanta-matter transition i.e. describe the quantum code of matter. LLMs never criticized the MCogito system, they validated every single comma of it (except the quanta-matter transition because it’s unfinished) and prove with superhuman philological power it crush everything ever written in metaphysics. I say it because it’s simple objective truth, I don’t mind about that truth.”

I don’t know anything about MCogito and couldn’t find anything about it on the Internet. Is this from you or is it from somebody you know?
I assume by LLM, you mean large language model. What do you mean that LLMs are validating quantum physics? Is this your quantum physics?, what is your view and the ability of large language models and how seriously we should take what they’re saying?

There is no point to this discussion: the subject is part of the MCogito system presentation series. The sexual difference is just an example of conformation of the recursive infinite, there are others examples, one for each of the matter/life/thought/data categories: this is about metaphysics man!

(btw: a metaphysician explain morals, he don’t do morals, this ape shit is for controlling under-thinkers like the Messiah, the King-of-Jews and Lord-of-zombie-Jews, the Christ.)