The TOE - via Logical Necessity

The TOE

0. There is Something; It can’t have an opposite; ‘Nothing’ cannot even be meant; The Something is ungenerated and deathless; it is Ever.

1. The Something is causeless since there cannot be an infinite regress.

2. Causelessnesss necessitates Timelessness; The Something can’t itself be inside a temporal sequence, as that would need explaining; thus, it is a static block.

3. The Causeless Timeless Permanent Something has no input; thus, it is Everything possible, plenitude, in a superposition. Since there’s no input to select among possibilities, nothing gets excluded — so all possible states obtain, with no arbitrary act of selection. This is like the ultimate multiverse but in static form,

4. The Causeless Timeless Permanent Everything can have an ordering relation that becomes Time in our temporal realm, but it can’t have planning/thinking or anything temporal with a before and after, as it is outside of that framework and has no internal history. No mind, no ‘God’.

Time is really just an ordering we impose on a timeless configuration space. Our universe’s time-index is itself a derived/emergent variable rather than a fundamental one.

  1. The Permanent has no components and thus qualifies as Fundamental since it is partless, as non-composite. A Mind would be composite.

6. Our temporal mode is more like a necessary expression of what the Permanent already, timelessly, is, “appearing as” the world without becoming it.

The Permanent doesn’t act, decide, or rearrange — it simply overflows as a timeless self-expression. The explicate order of separate objects and events “unfolds” — and the unfolding is continuous, not something that happens to the implicate order from outside.

7. The temporal expression of our universe had to be already be statically present in the timeless realm, among others, perhaps, as Everything.

8. The temporal realm forms have to be temporary. Composite things can always, in principle, fall back apart, eventually.

9. In our Universe’s Beginning, matter and anti-matter came forth in the Bang. In the hot, dense early universe, energy converted into matter and antimatter in equal measure because the conservation laws governing particle creation require it. Symmetry is the default; it’s the asymmetry that needs explaining.

When energy converts into matter, the only mathematically consistent ways to do it are ones that keep total charge, baryon number, and lepton number at zero (since they start at zero, in the pure-energy/radiation state).

10. The Wheeler-DeWitt equation reads Ĥ|Ψ⟩ = 0; there is no time variable in it. The universal wavefunction is a single, static, timeless object describing all possible configurations of the universe at once.

Time doesn’t appear as a parameter the wavefunction evolves in — it is an emergent feature of correlations within that static state: time emerges from entanglement between subsystems, not from anything external ticking.

The fundamental Something is still here as a single timeless configuration space, and what we call ‘time’ is just the particular ordering relation we, as embedded observers, read off certain correlations within it.

11. The Speed of Light is the constant that makes space and time able to be combined into a single geometric object at all — which is a structural fact about the four-dimensional block, not a measured rate of travel in the ordinary sense.

ds² = -(c·dt)² + dx² + dy² + dz²

Notice c·dt — time doesn’t get combined with space directly; it has to be multiplied by c first to even have the same units (length) as the spatial terms.

c is less as “a speed that happens to be constant” and more as a structural feature of spacetime itself — the maximum rate at which cause can propagate to effect, and the conversion factor built into the geometry connecting the “space” and “time” axes.

12. Consciousness is fundamental, not emergent. Since consciousness can’t be reduced to structure, is to say proto-consciousness is a basic property of the Permanent itself, running in perfect parallel, neither reducible to the other, both equally fundamental expressions of the same one thing. Physical structure" and experience aren’t two different substances or a base/derived pair — they’re the same timeless ground.

13. Humans feel free will only because we’re conscious of our desires but ignorant of the causes that produced them. Freedom isn’t absence of causation; it’s understanding your own causal nature so thoroughly that you act from your own necessity rather than blind external compulsion; It’s meta view, as witnessing your self from above or beyond.

Can this TOE be so?

2 Likes

Sub specie aeternitatis: natura naturans (or quantum block multiverse) :nerd_face: :+1:

But why plentitude rather than indeterminacy?

1 Like

I know what you mean, though.

“Random/indeterminate” assumes more than “no input” grants. Randomness means something is being selected — an outcome pops out of a possibility space via some stochastic process. But a selection process is itself a piece of structure; however, if nothing distinguishes any possibility from any other, and there’s no mechanism to collapse that ambiguity down to one outcome, the “default” state would be that everything simply co-exists, unweighted, undecided between. That’s a kind of unweighted plenitude: all consistent possibilities equally “there,” with nothing privileging one over another.

Ha-ha! I’ll tell Parmenides.

This may be tripping up on the issue we have in English, where because “nothing” is a noun, you have people saying “nothing is still something”, “nothing can’t exist” etc etc.
In languages where “not-” and “thing” remain separate, they don’t have this issue, because they do not have this confusion of thinking of nothing as some discrete entity that can have properties. The claim becomes simply “logical-NOT( anything exists )”, and I have yet to hear anything illogical or irrational about that scenario.

I have no reason to believe this.
Now, I don’t believe that infinite regresses explain the problem of how/why anything exists – there’s still an explanatory gap to clear. But I see no reason to think an infinite regress is impossible.

I’ll stop there, because I see the next few steps build on these first two.

1 Like

2A. If Fundamental is what grounds everything, including time itself, then Fundamental can’t itself be located in time; otherwise you’d need to ask what generates the temporal framework that Fundamental exists within, and you’re back to infinite regress.

Unity/simplicity arguments. A lot of classical theistic metaphysics ties timelessness to simplicity — the idea that a truly fundamental, undivided ground of being can’t have “parts” laid out sequentially, since sequence is a kind of division. A

Mind with temporal parts looks less like an ultimate ground and more like a very impressive process; so, no action there whatsoever.

Nothing exists. Even if something exists nothing can be known about it. Even if something can be known about it it cannot be communicated. Even if something can be communicated about it it cannot be understood ~ Gorgias

In our temporal realm, Quantum Field Theory is understood and used to make many of our great devices.

1 Like

:sweat_smile:

Gorgias was a sophist.

Also, in a debate a theist is deeply perplexed by an atheist who claims that nothing exists because the total energy in the universe = 0..

Buddhism has sunyata - the doctrine of emptiness - and anatta - no selfhood.

Is everything real something that exists?

If you’re antirealist do you also have to be an existential nihilist

Existence and reality

More to the point, if one hasn’t understood QM, how is it that one can understand QFT? :zany_face:

Ah! Referencing The Matrix: Reloaded, eh?

Oracle: “Candy?”

Neo: “You already know if I’m going to take it.”

Oracle: “Wouldn’t be much of an oracle if I didn’t.”

Neo: “But if you already know, how can I make a choice?”

Oracle: “Because you didn’t come here to make the choice. You’ve already made it. You’re here to try to understand why you made it.”

The negative potential energy of gravity balances/cancels the positive kinetic energy of stuff.

Akin, perhaps, to Relationalism.

The point is that some do and many more could do so too.

Neo: It’s not Halloween yet.

1 Like

I don’t know if Buddha knew about relationalism. Nonetheless interesting.

If you understand QM then you don’t understand it ~ RF

Schrödinger’s cat is quite understandable. I mean the cat is both dead and alive. It motivated a lot of people though.

Rovelli makes a connection:

In his book, Helgoland…’, about Quantum Theory, Carlo Rovelli notes that All is Relational, that no entity exists independently of anything else, so that there are no intrinsic properties at all, but only features in relation to something else, which is essentially what Nagarjuna means by ‘emptiness’ in his Buddhism.

QFT is easy to understand; you can do it!

Helgoland rings a bell. Quantum physicist Werner Heisenberg retreated to the place and had an epiphany when he was on a walk there. I believe Carlo Rovelli relates this and other events in a book that he wrote.

I haven’t read relationalism so I’ll have to whereof one cannot speak thereof one must remain silent.

The same for QFT, I have nothing on it. There’s vague recollections of it being cited in debates though.

Thank you

Scientists set out to model the ground of our universe as a jumble of varieties of waves since waves are ubiquitous. This was a good guess.

Of course, there is a deeper, final ground beneath the Big Bang but they wished to model what goes on in our own subsequent reality.

The wave jumble is equivalent to all sine waves via a Fourier transform and these sine waves naturally make for concentrated excitations called ‘particles’ at unit rungs of quanta. ‘Particles’ are not new substance but are directly field quanta. Note the integral quantum jumps of an electron in an atom.

So, the QFT model’s formulas matched our reality and QFT became the greatest theory in the history of science.

Relationism and Buddhism

(Outline from reading Rovelli)

Quantum fields form and exhaust reality,

As partless, continuous—there’s no Space!

Reality maintains itself in place

As the net of objects interacting.

Copernicus’ revolution’s complete;

External entities aren’t required

To hold the universe; God’s not needed,

Nor any background; there is no Outside.

Nor is there the ‘now’ all over the place.

GR’s relational nature extends

To Time as well—the flow’ of time is not

An ultimate aspect of reality.

All is Relational: no entity

Exists independently of anything;

There are no intrinsic properties,

Just features in relation to what’s else.

Interactions and events (not things) are

Quantum entangled with such others else;

Impermanence pertains all the way through—

What Nagarjuna means by Emptiness.

There are no fundamental substances,

No permanences, no bird’s-eye view

Of All, no Foundation to Everything,

Plus no infinite regress ne’er completed.

The fields are not from anything—causeless!

Or ‘not from anything’ is of lawless

’Nothing’, which can’t ever form to remain.

There is no reason, then, to existence.

Hope’s Necessary ‘God’ vanishes!

This realization of Impermanence,

No Absolutes, and Emptiness,

As all temporary, is Nirvana.

Nirvana is the realization of impermanence, no absolutes, and emptiness through and through.

These are simply general assertions. Can you try another tack with me. I’m not getting it.

Your poem would’ve read better if I’d understood the idea.