My interest is in the logic of the arguments.
The idea of a benevolent, omnipotent, omniscient being appears inconsistent wiht suffering.
Your response was rhetorical, it didn’t address the issue.
Treating evil as a privation implies that an omniscient being could not remove the privation. Why?
How do we understand a landslide or an earthquake a privation?
And so on. There’s a string of objections.
But of course you are under no obligation to respond.