The Grounding of Logic

[Materialist]

@Corvus

Any physical objects in reality can be in a thing as soon as you point to them and make a statement indicating the object is a thing you are describing or stating. Whether the object was in motion or rest, it will be contained in the conceptual space of a thing.

I was going to post something similar. In Kripkean terms, we’re equating “referent” with “thing”. Of course, this is conceptual - and may, or may not, map to something ontological. But it seems to me to be a reasonable basis for an ontological theory: that existence consists of things.