Morality as a practice in human affairs and moral hierarchy

Ethics
1

In life everything has an unintended consequence and we could all be closely examined and be deemed immoral, so being moral is only a concept that you can practice in a setting of human affairs. As it would have to fall on the fact that humans have very little control over how moral they even can be considering the circumstances of daily life and misinformation. Yet morality is not even a concept in nature as each animal does not have the capacity to understand morals or the harm they do or just don’t care and are nihilistic.

So if human morals are not clear and most every other animal is oblivious
Then are human morals a fluke?, no because there are other animals in nature that are completely unforgiving when causing harm to outsiders but still care for their fellow pack mates or their ‘troop’ as it is called for chimps so its clear to me that human morals that are reguarded in philosophy are different (or romanticized) from any kind acts that a human does to people who are kind to them like there are definitely people in the world who are nice to their peers but still don’t care when they cause harm on people who are different from them.

And im not really that good at this im sure this probably doesn’t matter but idk its a start. So feel free to criticize i need advice to help my writing philosophy.

2

Could you also say the opposite though? If we were all closely examined we could be deemed moral just the same, you could apply this same logic to animals in the same way you have already done. I do not think ethics are something isolated to the human experience but many of us are privileged in a way animals are not simply by being exposed to even the concept of morality, and various schools of thought, it is not even necessarily a matter of right or wrong, and who are we to conceive the notion that there is a universal morality that must be followed, ethics are not inherent and are almost entirely subjective.

3

Not sure I can tell what you’re arguing, as you don’t define what you think morality is.

There are many different ways of understanding morality (many different stories we tell ourselves about it) and the questions we might ask depend on which understanding we have in mind.

For instance, if morality comes from a transcendent source of goodness, let’s call it God, then the question you’re asking can be broadened considerably.

If, on the other hand, morality is more like a code of conduct that has evolved because it is advantageous to our survival as a social species, then the story could be much less complicated.