In life everything has an unintended consequence and we could all be closely examined and be deemed immoral, so being moral is only a concept that you can practice in a setting of human affairs. As it would have to fall on the fact that humans have very little control over how moral they even can be considering the circumstances of daily life and misinformation. Yet morality is not even a concept in nature as each animal does not have the capacity to understand morals or the harm they do or just don’t care and are nihilistic.
So if human morals are not clear and most every other animal is oblivious
Then are human morals a fluke?, no because there are other animals in nature that are completely unforgiving when causing harm to outsiders but still care for their fellow pack mates or their ‘troop’ as it is called for chimps so its clear to me that human morals that are reguarded in philosophy are different (or romanticized) from any kind acts that a human does to people who are kind to them like there are definitely people in the world who are nice to their peers but still don’t care when they cause harm on people who are different from them.
And im not really that good at this im sure this probably doesn’t matter but idk its a start. So feel free to criticize i need advice to help my writing philosophy.