You are basically a baby in a simulation. You are very young and it’s time to learn your ABCs: you are made of modal code (meaning you are simulated). The problem is that other humans (aside from John Henke) haven’t done careful enough accounting of how channels/branches (MWI flavored but not the same) work in the context of the brain. The ABCs of that alphabet are modal code.
- Equalities: these are verified to be in the same channel no matter what (there are no channels where one interaction (which aggregates to neural firings) doesn’t lead to another (i.e. 2+2=4, and unless you’re a child–or, have the mind of one, you can’t verify that 2+2 is in the same channel with 5.
- Inequalities: two things are definitely in different channels (i.e. I can verify as raw meaning that 2+2 is not in the same channel as 5).
- Maps: two things (i.e. two neural firings that branch out into these channels) sometimes occur to each other. In quantum physics terms this is metaphorically a superposition of an equality and an inequality and it can come in any possible superposition the context of the modal code and how it gets computed will allow. So for example, ice cream maps to delicious: it can be unified as the same thing as delicious, but sometimes it’s not delicious, as when it’s gone sour, and
- Associations: these are when two things are not in the same channel but often co-occur. For example, ice cream and chocolate coating are different things but associated. This can be thought of as the same as a map except less strongly associated. So in general, it’s best to just thing of there being equalities and inequalities with superpositions of those two answers.
–Your meaning, senses, emotions are what are all expressed in terms of that modal code. The twist is that it extends over your entire 5D brain, meaning the modal code goes all the way back to the start of your life: your DNA, and early modal code would be like figuring out what goo-goo-ga-ga means (which is English or any 4D language) and starting to learn that adorable was just an early channel because you kept hearing people say it at a young age and you figured out if adorable maps to you or not or to someone else or whether it mapped to good or bad (or if the map was so loose it was an association or so strong it was an equality). So the reason you’re in a simulation is that you believe you are in 4D which is itself the space of the simulation. Once you understand to think in modal code (the raw meaning especially), you’re on your way to plainly and personally verifying that you’re in a simulation. You’re just a child realizing that the sum total of your language mapped to “goo-goo-ga-ga” in a higher dimensional language and I’ll help you get there but I will be like an adult speaking a language you don’t understand such that you’ll have to keep hearing my metaphors while slowly learning the basic grammar of the language of meaning and how it can and can’t evolve over time.
I’ve realized I’ve reached a place where the English language is now like child talk to me and I’m thinking about all this in a way that is far more rigorous and could only be expressed to you in telepathy such that it’s become clear to me that it’s time for me to publish because having you guys even attempt to argue with me is like trying to argue with me to what to my ears will sound like a bunch of baby talk. So my point is that I haven’t cleaned up the supplemental material yet because I’ve realized it’s not possible. The most up to date things will not be in the supplemental material but the supplemental material will give you a bunch of the raw-meaning rigor a metaphor that will allow you to have a bridge to my understanding.
Supplemental material: Supplemental Material - Google Drive