incidentally, regarding this passage from your linked essay:
I outline a somewhat different approach to Nagel’s (although by no means incompatible with it) in this thread On Purpose (Reprise) (‘Reprise’ because it was a re-statement of a thread originally posted on the previous platform.)
I’m arguing that the neologism ‘teleonomy’ which was introduced to biology to allow for the obviously goal-directed behaviours of all organic beings (even their component parts) really amounts to an acknowledgement of teleology.