A new concept of causality for the matter-life-thought multi-categorical metaphysics

Abstract : this post demonstrate a new concept of causality that works the same for any category of beings : material, living, thinking.
In my first post : Breaking the [Nature-Human] bi-categorical framework of Philosophy I logically explained why, in the defective bi-categorical [nature-human] framework of Philosophy, it’s impossible to create any working metaphysical system and why general philosophy is an endless neurotic arguing (for a canonical example have a look at the “taxonomy of hinges” thread).
By switching to the self-evident [matter-life-thought] multi-categorical framework I could define Being as code-controlled structure and categories of beings as being-code topologies.
In the second post The [ Non-Being [ Being ] ] logical Totality is the [quanta>matter>life>thought>data] structure of Reality I showed that reality is a set of five categories of beings, interfaced by special carrier beings.
This post will explore the causality of categories, i.e. how beings interact and self-create inside a category and how categories relate causally between themselves.

4.6 Causality proper to each category — Causal independence through meta causality

Because of the equivalence matter=life=thought as a uniform source for the construction of beings, each category of being is causally independent of the others, which it does not know at all. Life knows only life, thought only thought, and matter only matter. Since the numerical is at the end of the quanta>matter>life>thought>data series, it offers an exact image of this absolute causal independence: any reality can be created in computing, but the computer’s internal dynamics know only binary code, because all inputs and outputs appear there only in already coded form at specific locations in memory. Likewise DNA code knows only itself, i.e., feedback loops inside the cell that return to DNA code. Language manipulates only shared ideas, which know only other shared ideas through language. And of course material phenomena reduce solely to univocal physical law.

This causal independence is really easy to understand: a causality is always a meta causality, an over causality that takes control of the underlying causality. In a living organism the molecules that constitute it are under the control of its DNA code. The psycho neuronal functioning of an individual is under the control of human ideas, which exist between individuals through language. The quantum multiplicity of particles is collapsed by the macroscopic material object that contains them.

Of course one causality cannot modify an underlying causality: DNA does not modify the laws of physics, for example. It creates an autonomous causal order of a higher degree.

Here we can propose a rather deep idea about the central role of code for causal independence: it is the fact that a being is referred to its code that brings its sub causal content—that is, belonging to the previous category—under control.

4.7 Causal lightness — throughput of beings — categories linking

Causal lightness: each category mobilizes more or less energy in the creation of beings. Creating a pre biotic planetary system requires far more energy than creating a living species, and infinitely more than creating an idea, and googolplex times more than creating digital code.

The link between categories is trivial and comes only from the speed differential in the construction of beings. It is much faster to construct a new living species than a solar system, and enormously faster to construct an idea than a living species, and infinitely faster still to construct a digital simulation: roughly 10 billion years of evolution of physics since the Big Bang to construct an Earth capable of producing the pre biotic chemical soup; 1 billion years for the biological to construct the human being; 1 million years since the appearance of language; and 100 years for the digital to reach effective AI. Overall we have a factor of about 1000 between categories. Beings of higher categories know only themselves, but being produced with a much higher throughput of beings, they tend to mold from the outside, the forms or characteristics of lower beings. The relation between categories passes through the outside, by flocking of beings. Living beings become more and more adapted and knowledge becomes more and more precise, i.e., molds ever better the beings of the slower lower categories: words know only words—i.e.,ideas only ideas—but the network of shared ideas ends up molding the objects of the slower categories of life and matter; likewise the digital manages to reproduce any idea in code.

4.8 Upward link: external control of category n by category n−1

We can distinguish an upward link that passes through the outside from one category to the next, through fundamental forms of level n that will be primitively molded by category n+1 and thus condition it. This is how a domain which in itself is an infinity absolutely independent is held on a leash by the previous domain. For example Thought in itself is totally free and has nothing to do with the biological, but it is carried by the human species, which exists only insofar as it respects the constraints of the living, the most powerful being animal life in ethnic “troops” and selective sexual reproduction. In other species these constraints are handled by instincts, behaviors neurologically predefined. But the neurological is not an actor in the domain of ideas: only Thought can create ideas. Because of the causal independence of the psychic, the biological (i.e.,evolution) is forced to pass through the outside, through the appearance of bodies, so that in early childhood Thought creates primary ideas that are very constrained—ideas instincts—which will have exactly the same effect as instincts. By analyzing how the very long growth and the very marked sexual difference of the human body shape the infinity of Thought, one obtains an animal and sexual anthropology grounded metaphysically, from which one can metaphysically construct a Politics—the anti-predation—disruptive of our Judeo-Athenian moral enslavement.

In the next post I’ll explain how Reality self-construct itself starting from the Thought->Data transition : How Reality Self-Constructs Across Categories of Being (The Dynamic Heart of Reality)

I think you may be onto something important : the comprehensive role of Causality in the creation of Matter, the emergence of Life from non-life, and the eventual inception of Mind from mindless substance. Yet, again your idiosyncratic vocabulary is not in my dictionary. So, a glossary of special terms, such as your bolded words, would help to guide us to a logical conclusion.

The Information Philosopher calls that Creative Causality : In-Form-Action1. In my own thesis, I spell it EnFormAction, to indicate it’s relationship to physical Energy. :slightly_smiling_face:

1. In-Form-action : According to the Information Philosopher, information is a physically embodied, measurable quantity that constitutes the meaningful structure of the universe. It is “in-form-action”, defined as the “difference that makes a difference”. Information is considered immaterial—existing as relationships and arrangements—yet it requires a material carrier to be stored or communicated.
https://www.informationphilosopher.com/

ouch ! your site is so huge ! (and beautiful). I have to plan something to study it. Just on what you wrote here : I prefer “code” over information because it’s more control oriented and embody the idea of information. I’m currently working of a more precise notion of code that lead me to find where is and what is the quantum coding of matter (which is not material but “interferential” btw). Did you get any return on your information philosophy ? (I gave up on this long time ago, only recently the LLMs pushed me to try to interact again with the wetware powered thing :slight_smile:

If you are talking about the InformationPhilosopher site, it’s not mine. But it was influential and informative back when I began my own website1, based on the fusion of Quantum Physics and Information Theory. I’ve been “studying” the IP website for many years, and have only skimmed the surface. I’m currently doing a blog post on Bob Doyle, who calls himself "The Information Philosopher"2.

What he called “In-Form-Action”, and what I spell “EnFormAction” is universal and ubiquitous in the universe. But it takes on many different forms, from general Causality to physical Energy to tangible Matter to self-aware Mind. So, it’s hard for some people to comprehend.

Since I think of Cosmic Evolution as a kind of computer program — processing natural Laws (Information) & dynamic Energy into all the things & actions we experience — EnFormAction (the power to transform) is the code or language of Nature that computes the reality that we now experience.

You’ll need to add “interferential” to your glossary, because I’d never heard of it, and Google only finds references to Electrical Stimulation Therapy. In developing my thesis, I also used some arcane terminology, and coined some new terms, in order to convey novel ideas that were not mainstream. But even philosophically inclined people will give-up in frustration if the idiosyncratic language sets up road blocks. So I had to add a Glossary3 to help me keep track of my own arcane ideas. It’s now way out of date, because I continue to develop ideas in the BothAnd Blog. :slightly_smiling_face:

1. https://enformationism.info/enformationism.info/

2. (Post 151a -- INFORMATION PHILOSOPHER)

3. https://blog-glossary.enformationism.info/