Unable to back up with rules meant to keep God out of the equation, you mean.
I know the rules quite well.
The laws of logic are coinherent on the ontological level. No more disguises…
“Enemy-occupied territory—that is what this world is. Christianity is the story of how the rightful king has landed, you might say landed in disguise, and is calling us to take part in a great campaign of sabotage.”
-C.S. Lewis
Relying on god is methodologically inept. An account that explains anything is not an explanation. "God did it’ will explain anything and everything, and hence is useless. If nothing is ruled out, nothing is actually explained.
You said methodo’logically’.
God’s triune logical nature does indeed explain everything. However, since we’re not omniscient, we can continue learning infinitely and eternally without ever having approached, ‘explaining everything’.
And it does rule out materialism and methodological naturalism as a circular transitive loop.
To each his own, but I do not share your assessment. I don’t find your logic very logical.
You are not doing logic. You are doing theology.
That’s what logic is, ‘theo(God)-ology(logos)’
It is precisely because logic is fundamental and ontological that we can understand anything at all.
You’re doing materialism.
Is logic personal or impersonal?
If you say ‘impersonal’ you are making a truth claim as a ‘person’.