Geoff, thank you for taking the time to share your comments, questions.
And yes, according the physicists they do “communication” to be mistaken with having a discussion.
Where did I say that they were “conscious” or possess “intelligence”?? Those are concept you have just injected, and they do not relate to the essay’s wording.
I think not. I admit this OP essay has issue and inconsistencies and gaps, which I think I did a good job of buttoning up in “Take Two” Although as it stands now that is still missing the essay’s “closure” which took another couple days to percolate to the surface of my thoughts. It’s sweet the way it came together, but life is crowded and the ending still needs some polishing before it’s ready for posting.
I suggest you goggle that question:
Actually, physicists and chemists use terms like “atomic communication” as a metaphor to describe quantum entanglement, molecular signaling, and information transfer in physics. While atoms do not have minds, conscious thoughts, or intent, they absolutely exchange information through fundamental forces.