Is not the case, because obviously if you choose between left and right in your mind, then if you choose left in your mind, then instantaneously in your mind the alternative of left is made the present. That it then takes some time to move your body to the left is not relevant.
And in principle you can also choose left instead of right, without first choosing it in your mind, as like with salsa dancing or something.
You also didn’t address the argument that you can’t put any intermediate steps between the decision made and the result of the decision, because the decision is the mechanism of creation. So that you then have no mechanism to originate these supposed intermediate steps.
Then later you also made this same error, by saying that selection precedes decision. How do you suppose these selections originate without the mechanism for creation?
And generally like all the other people here, you argue by assertion, and not by following rules. And not working towards a functional conceptual framework.
You have to follow rules ok? The rules state that whatever is defined in terms of doing the job of choosing, can only be identified with a chosen opinion. God, emotions, personal character (like courage) are all defined as such.
So it is a matter of chosen opinion whether you as being a decision-maker are divine. So then I relate as being a decision-maker myself, to you as being a decision-maker, and then I feel in what spirit you make your decisions, and then I express those feelings, choosing an opinion on the issue whether you are divine or not.