I am a Moral Nihilist

[Leontiskos]

@Banno

Even in cases of such basic disagreement, we have room for discourse. Both parties can set out their reasoning, and look to the other for coherence, contrast, contradiction and so forth. There are indeed issues here.

And of course, the discourse is not guaranteed to come to a conclusion.

Deliberating on “why?” is not excluded by my argument, but set aside in cases of agreement.

Good. So then returning to my post here, it seems to me that these three things follow from your view:

1. There is no need for ethical deliberation
2. Nevertheless, it is possible to engage in fruitful ethical deliberation
3. It is possible to reach agreement even when we disagree

Would you affirm my interpretation? Are you saying that these three things follow from your view, or are at least compatible with your view?