# I am a Moral Nihilist

**URL:** <https://www.thephilosophyforum.com/t/i-am-a-moral-nihilist/1218>\
**Category:** Ethics\
**Created:** [June 3, 2026, 4:42pm UTC](https://www.thephilosophyforum.com/t/i-am-a-moral-nihilist/1218 "2026-06-03T16:42:17Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 467

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Leontiskos](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex007/user_avatar/www.thephilosophyforum.com/leontiskos/32/712_2.png) [@Leontiskos](https://www.thephilosophyforum.com/u/Leontiskos)\
**Post date:** [June 11, 2026, 11:20pm UTC](https://www.thephilosophyforum.com/t/i-am-a-moral-nihilist/1218/467 "2026-06-11T23:20:51Z")

</div>

Tarski would not come to your aid were he alive. He would be scratching his head along with the rest of us.

“P is true iff P”

These are not sufficient according to the T-schema:

- “Jane believes P”
- “Jane thinks P”
- “Jane has a preference for P”

Allusions to Tarski do not actually help your case. He would in no way recognize claims like this one:

> [@Banno](#):
>
> That we have preferences establishes that there are true normative statements.

---

_[View the full topic](https://www.thephilosophyforum.com/t/i-am-a-moral-nihilist/1218)._