I think first the word or say termen of God is already gives it some religious association and therefor missleading.
There for i will refer to it as an infinite intelligence as i find it more appropriate.
And here my theory about it:
The infinite Intelligence is everything.
Nothing is truly apart from it but rather all inside of it.
Been an boundless existence that has no restrictions what so ever do not require any form of energy and so no limits to create whatever and manipulate it in any one of infinite ways.
The only restrictions exist are the ones that self-made on self,
and the function of them is to know self in an infinite new manners.
So the question to an existence of a paradox is only inside temporary instance of self-restricting self and there and only there can it be even possible to be considered.
Because that in the original state of infinite self 2 contractional logics can be without paradox, and not only 2.
In-fact it can be endless sum of contradictions infinite been in same space if you can call it space and still not be a paradox.
It’s a bit like asking “can an omnipotent being make itself not omnipotent” and then demanding that the ability to be not-omnipotent is essential to true omnipotence.
I read an article a while back, and I forget who wrote it, that makes the point that the whole issue can be made logically equivalent with: “God can lift all stones.”
However, I don’t think the problem is wholly trivial. I think it highlights a deeper conceptual issue vis-a-vis the distinction between potency and power, and potency and actuality. The power to potentially do all things is a sort of potency. This potential is not yet actual, and on the classical view, God actualizes what is potential according to God’s nature (wisdom, goodness, etc.).
A power is a structured potency. In this case it is the power to actualize anything (that is possible). Behind it, has to sit pure actuality. If we had any admixture of potency and actuality, it would simply be the actuality alone that explained how anything potential became actualized, since what is merely potential does not spontaneously become actual at random. But a power cannot be ordered to negating the actuality that is prior to it. Being “not able to lift” that which can potentially be lifted requires potency, which is excluded from pure actuality. Privation, e.g., an “inability to lift,” is a lack of actuality/being. God cannot “change” into a state of “lesser power” as this would require that pure actuality itself contains the potential to be nothing, which is a contradiction in terms.
More simply, it is like asking if the universal light by which all things are can create a shadow it cannot illuminate. The shadow just is the absence of the light.
The error, I think, at least in a classical framing, is to presuppose that God is simply a “most powerful being” within a broader container universe of beings, so that God can cease to be ominpotent through an act of will, in the same way that a man with the power to practice medicine can decide to retire from being a doctor.
In my previous post, I gave the reason for why God can lift all stones, and why God cannot create a stone so heavy that He cannot lift it. God is not all powerful. God is perfectly powerful. God cannot create perfection.
I agree. God is perfect. God cannot actualize His full potential because of His perfect nature. God cannot use His perfect power for evil, otherwise He would not be God.