# Generic failures in arguments for the nonexistence God

**URL:** <https://www.thephilosophyforum.com/t/generic-failures-in-arguments-for-the-nonexistence-god/2715>\
**Category:** Philosophy of Religion\
**Tags:** god\
**Created:** [August 25, 2026, 12:31am UTC](https://www.thephilosophyforum.com/t/generic-failures-in-arguments-for-the-nonexistence-god/2715 "2026-08-25T00:31:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 340

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![180Proof](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex007/user_avatar/www.thephilosophyforum.com/180proof/32/1100_2.png) [@180Proof](https://www.thephilosophyforum.com/u/180Proof)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2026, 5:22pm UTC](https://www.thephilosophyforum.com/t/generic-failures-in-arguments-for-the-nonexistence-god/2715/340 "2026-09-18T17:22:55Z")

</div>

> [@Scorpion](#):
>
> **Human** morality isn’t objective.

😑

E.g. Any _human_ who protects a baby from abuse or prevents a child from being raped is far more _moral_ than a “God” that allegedly has the power to stop every instance of these crimes yet does not.

Again: Suffering is a _natural fact_; therefore, to the degree morality (re: moral agency) is based on – derived from – suffering, it is _objective_ (i.e. subject/culture-invariant).

---

_[View the full topic](https://www.thephilosophyforum.com/t/generic-failures-in-arguments-for-the-nonexistence-god/2715)._