# Decision to close Sam's Clarity of Concepts discussion -

**URL:** https://www.thephilosophyforum.com/t/decision-to-close-sams-clarity-of-concepts-discussion/971
**Category:** Feedback
**Tags:** ai, guidelines
**Created:** [May 11, 2026, 9:55am UTC](https://www.thephilosophyforum.com/t/decision-to-close-sams-clarity-of-concepts-discussion/971 "2026-05-11T09:55:10Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 156

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![WeSee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/c5a1d2/32.png) [@WeSee](https://www.thephilosophyforum.com/u/WeSee)
#### Post date: [May 16, 2026, 10:44am UTC](https://www.thephilosophyforum.com/t/decision-to-close-sams-clarity-of-concepts-discussion/971/156 "2026-05-16T10:44:42Z")

</div>

Quite frankly, I’m still at a loss as to why including AI generated quotes (that are clearly indicated as such) as a source of additional information should be prohibited while including quotes from various other authors as a source of additional information are allowed. Neither are the “voice” of the poster which seemed to be your reason for prohibiting it that you gave on another thread.

> [@What Counts as AI-Generated Content on TPF](https://www.thephilosophyforum.com/t/what-counts-as-ai-generated-content-on-tpf/617/15):
>
> I provided abundant reasoning in the announcement as to why we disallow AI-generated content. It applies to quotations too.

Your reasoning was far from “abundant”, much less adequate.

---

_[View the full topic](https://www.thephilosophyforum.com/t/decision-to-close-sams-clarity-of-concepts-discussion/971)._