This isn’t working. Let’s take a concrete example:
Some (most?) states require you to file papers called tax returns depending on your income. And if you don’t, they can ultimately assault and kidnap you at your home. I think most people find this assault morally acceptable, but if an average individual were to assault someone for refusing to file what they wanted, it would be considered immoral. If you agree with both of these characterizations, then the question is: why does the state agent that assaults you in this instance have the privilege of being considered morally permissible to do so?